BAUM RESIDENCE CORP. v. VAN ROSSON


206 Misc. 314 (1954)

Baum Residence Corporation, Respondent, v. Peggy Van Rosson, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

May 27, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Michael Fox for appellant.

Morris J. Goldston for respondent.

HOFSTADTER and EDER, JJ., concur in Per Curiam memorandum; HAMMER, J., dissents in memorandum.


Per Curiam.

The trial judge should have granted the motion to dismiss made at the close of all the evidence. The bar against recovery of rent set forth in section 302 of the Multiple Dwelling Law, for the period during which a dwelling is occupied, when no certificate of occupancy as required by section 301 thereof has prior thereto been obtained, comprehends within its prohibition any action to recover for the use...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases