NOLOP v. SPETTEL


267 Wis. 245 (1954)

NOLOP, Respondent, vs. SPETTEL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 8, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Johns, Roraff, Pappas & Flaherty of La Crosse, and oral argument by Leonard F. Roraff.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hale, Skemp, Nietsch, Hanson & Schnurrer of La Crosse, and oral argument by Thomas H. Skemp.


FAIRCHILD, C. J.

Although there was never a written contract between the parties to this action, it is stipulated that they agreed to be bound by a written contract that had existed between the respondent and one Doctor Hulick, the pertinent portions of which contract follow:

"2. The owner agrees and covenants with the contractor to pay or cause to be paid to the contractor for the work performed, and the materials furnished by the contractor as follows:<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases