1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 176 Kan.
  5. 176 Kan. 334 (1954)
 

LELAND v. KANSAS STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS

No. 39,382

176 Kan. 334 (1954)

270 P.2d 255

FORREST K. LELAND, Plaintiff, v. THE KANSAS STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed May 8, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Hinkle, of Wichita, argued the cause for the plaintiff.

Robert E. Hoffman, assistant attorney general, argued the cause, and Harold R. Fatzer, attorney general, was with him on the brief for the defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

THIELE, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners to reinstate a license previously issued to the plaintiff and arising out of the following undisputed facts.

On October 14, 1950, the above Board issued to plaintiff a license to practice chiropractic and thereafter he established an office in the city of Protection, in Comanche county. In November, 1951...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases