TOMAN v. LAKE


268 Wis. 239 (1954)

TOMAN and another, Appellants, vs. TOWN OF LAKE and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 7, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by George A. Bowman and William H. Bowman, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by William H. Bowman.

For the respondents there was a brief by Walter J. Mattison, city attorney of Milwaukee, and Alan H. Steinmetz and Arthur Saltzstein, assistant city attorneys, and oral argument by Mr. Steinmetz.


BROADFOOT, J.

It appears from the very meager record before us that proceedings were had under the provisions of sec. 66.02, Stats., for the consolidation of the town of Lake and the city of Milwaukee. No attack is made upon the validity of that section but the affidavit recites that the general nature and object of the action is to contest the validity of said proceedings. Apparently the proceedings resulted in a consolidation, or an absorption of the town of Lake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases