1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 125 Cal.App.2d
  5. 125 Cal.App.2d 378 (1954)
 

POOTEL v. CITY & COUNTY OF S.F.

Docket No. 15772.

125 Cal.App.2d 378 (1954)

270 P.2d 553

EDWARD R. POOTEL, Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

May 20, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Bernard J. Ward, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants.

Molly H. Minudri and Manuel L. Furtado for Respondent.

GIBSON (Lilburn), J. pro tem.*

We are satisfied the judgment in this case may not be upheld.

The respondent was a member of the San Francisco Police Department from June 19, 1914 until his retirement on June 30, 1950. During this time he served in the capacity of patrolman, sergeant, lieutenant, captain of traffic and director of traffic, and in the course of his said employment worked several hours overtime. Prior to February...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases