CAPOZZI v. SCHEINER


77 So.2d 424 (1954)

Nicholas CAPOZZI, Appellant, v. Benjamin SCHEINER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

Rehearing Denied January 18, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Turnbull & Pepper, Tallahassee, Raymond G. Nathan, Miami, for appellant Nicholas Capozzi.

Dubbin, Blatt & Schiff, Miami, for appellants Adamco, Inc., and Anthony Damiano.

J.M. Flowers, Miami, for appellee L.M. Gerstel, receiver.

George H. Henry, Miami, for appellee Benjamin Scheiner.


MATHEWS, Justice.

In this case a going concern bought considerable equipment and machinery on retain title contract which was used in conducting an ice cream business. The ice cream company owned the building. After the equipment and machinery was installed the ice cream company got in default and the President of the company made considerable effort to borrow money to pay for the machinery. He was unsuccessful and the firm finally went "on the rocks".

In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases