EDDLEMAN v. McGHAN

No. 32946.

45 Wn.2d 430 (1954)

275 P.2d 729

WILLIAM R. EDDLEMAN, Respondent, v. C.D. McGHAN et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

October 21, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clemans & Kasperson and W.A. Raley, for appellants.

Eddleman & Wheeler, for respondent.


OLSON, J.

When an alleged stipulation or agreement of compromise does not comply with the pertinent rule or statute because it is not in writing and subscribed by the attorney denying it, can conflicting evidence of its consummation be considered, to sustain an offset pleaded in an action other than the cause in which the stipulation allegedly was made?

The trial court disregarded such evidence, denied defendants' offset, and entered judgment for plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases