KURTZ v. OREMLAND


16 N.J. 454 (1954)

109 A.2d 286

JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BENJAMIN OREMLAND, PEARL OREMLAND, DAVID LEWIS AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DUNN'S ENGLISH LEATHER SHOP, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND LOUIS W. DUNN AND JESSIE R. DUNN, AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 15, 1954.

Decided November 22, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Greene & Hellring, attorneys).

Mr. David M. Perskie, Mr. William Elmer Brown, Jr., and Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Perskie and Perskie, and Messrs. Brown and Frank, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below. 33 N.J.Super. 443 (Ch. Div. 1954).

For affirmance — Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices JACOBS and BRENNAN...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases