DANE COUNTY v. BLOOMFIELD


267 Wis. 193 (1954)

DANE COUNTY, Appellant, v. BLOOMFIELD, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 8, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Richard W. Bardwell, district attorney, and William F. Lorenz, Jr., assistant district attorney.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Donald W. Kaatz of Madison.


BROADFOOT, J.

The defendant makes the same argument upon this appeal. He cites sec. 85.84 of the Wisconsin statutes, which reads as follows:

"No local authority shall have power to enact, pass, enforce, or maintain any ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation requiring local registration or other requirements inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter, or in any manner excluding or prohibiting any motor vehicle, trailer, or semi-trailer, whose owner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases