CANADAY ET UX. v. DAVIS ET UX.


201 Or. 252 (1954)

269 P.2d 844

CANADAY ET UX. v. DAVIS ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 28, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William K. Shepherd, of Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

George H. Layman, of Newberg, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and LUSK, TOOZE and PERRY, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PER CURRIAM.

This is a suit for reformation of a warranty deed and for injunctive relief, brought by A.L. Canaday and Cammie Canaday, his wife, as plaintiffs, against E.E. Davis and Thelma Davis, his wife, as defendants. Decree was entered in favor of plaintiffs as prayed for in their complaint; defendants appeal.

The warranty deed involved in this litigation was one duly executed and acknowledged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases