BROWN, J.
Appellant submits that the promise to pay for the food by a provision in Schmidt's will was not proved by clear and convincing evidence and was not sufficiently specific to be enforceable; and that in fact Mr. Riebow furnished the food gratuitously and without expectation of reimbursement. The testimony of the Riebows is clear and direct concerning the agreement. It is not controverted by any other evidence and in its essential feature, that neither
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.