1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 121 F.Supp.
  5. 121 F.Supp. 320 (1954)
 

HOUDRY PROCESS CORP. v. SINCLAIR REFINING CO.

No. 15118.

121 F.Supp. 320 (1954)

HOUDRY PROCESS CORP. v. SINCLAIR REFINING CO.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 17, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Hamilton, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Harry E. Sprogell, Philadelphia, Pa., R. T. McLean, New York City, for defendant.

GANEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought the action here involved to recover royalties allegedly owed it under a patent rights licensing agreement. Defendant pleaded in tripartite fashion to the complaint. First, in an answer it denies that it owed any amount under the agreement. Second, by way of counterclaim it alleges plaintiff was liable to defendant for overpayments. And third, under the heading of "further counterclaim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases