1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 201 Or.
  5. 201 Or. 239 (1954)
 

HAYNES v. LORING ET UX.

201 Or. 239 (1954)

269 P.2d 528

HAYNES v. LORING ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 21, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore S. Bloom argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Lenske, Spiegel, Spiegel, Martindale & Bloom, of Portland.

Warde H. Erwin argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Boyd, Ferris & Erwin, of Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, LUSK and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit for reformation of a contract for the sale of real property, and for specific performance thereof as reformed, brought by R.W. Haynes, as plaintiff, against Michael Loring and his wife, as defendants. Decree was entered in favor of plaintiff as prayed for in his complaint. Defendants appeal.

We have examined the record in this case and find no merit in the appeal. Hayward v. Morrison et ux.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases