1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 32 N.J.
  5. 32 N.J. Super. 406 (1954)
 

VAN TUYL v. FEDERAL SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK CO.

32 N.J. Super. 406 (1954)

108 A.2d 483

WILLIAM VAN TUYL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. FEDERAL SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 13, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for petitioner-respondent.

Mr. John J. Monigan, Jr., argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys; Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., of counsel).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Appeal is taken from a judgment of the county court affirming a judgment of a deputy director of the Division of Workmen's Compensation, Department of Labor and Industry, wherein appellant was directed to furnish petitioner medical treatment in an attempt to cure a draining sinus in the back resulting from an occupational accidental injury.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases