1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 201 Or.
  5. 201 Or. 234 (1954)
 

CASTEEL v. KING ET AL.

201 Or. 234 (1954)

269 P.2d 529

CASTEEL v. KING ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 21, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Bryson, of Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Bryson & Bryson, of Eugene.

Daniel R. Dimick, of Roseburg, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Winston & Dimick and Robert M. Stults, of Roseburg.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, ROSSMAN and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff seeks specific performance, as undisclosed principal, of a land purchase contract wherein defendant King agreed to sell his property to defendant Coleman.

It appears that plaintiff brought King and Coleman together in connection with the sale. Plaintiff and King had had some difficulty over previous business transactions, and on account thereof King inquired of both plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases