1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 201 Or.
  5. 201 Or. 225 (1954)
 

NEWTON v. PICKELL

201 Or. 225 (1954)

269 P.2d 508

NEWTON v. PICKELL, ADMINISTRATOR ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 21, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray Rhoten argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, of Salem.

James O. Goodwin, of Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Glenn R. Jack, of Oregon City.

Before WARNER, Acting Chief Justice, and LUSK, BRAND and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, A.C.J.

The plaintiff Ida A. Newton brings this suit to set aside the deed hereinafter referred to as being a conveyance in fraud of her rights accruing under an antenuptial agreement made between her and her husband in 1947. From a decree favorable to plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

Plaintiff and William L. Newton were married on June 17, 1947. Marital difficulties led to their separation sometime in March 1949. This culminated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases