1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 135 F.Supp.
  5. 135 F.Supp. 275 (1954)
 

HOOKER ELECTROCHEMICAL CO. v. WATSON

Civ. A. No. 2342-52.

135 F.Supp. 275 (1954)

HOOKER ELECTROCHEMICAL CO., Plaintiff, v. Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

February 25, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Laurence, Jackson, Miss., John S. Roberts, Jr., Percy H. Moore, James B. VanderKelen, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

E. L. Reynolds, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

LETTS, District Judge.

Essentially the sole reason assigned by defendant for refusing the patent is that, as he sees it, the claims sought define subject matter that is not inventively different from that disclosed in the British patent to Burrage et al., 573,693, dated December 3, 1945, for the reason that the distinction relates to the amount of solvent employed in dissolving the crude hexachlorocyclohexane mixture, and that the selection of the amount to

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases