IN RE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY

No. 4827-J.

127 F.Supp. 278 (1954)

In the Matter of FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, Debtor.

United States District Court, S. D. Florida.

June 28, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell L. Frink, Jacksonville, Fla., for trustee.

John B. L'Engle, Jacksonville, Fla., for F. E. C. Ry. Co.

William D. Mitchell, Mitchell, Capron, Marsh, Angulo & Cooney, New York City, and Giles J. Patterson, Patterson, Freeman, Richardson & Watson, Jacksonville, Fla., for St. Joe Paper Co.

Adair, Kent & Ashby, Jacksonville, Fla., for Trustees of the Estate of Alfred I. duPont.

H. Plant Osborne, Osborne, Copp & Markham, Jacksonville, Fla., for Guaranty Trust Co. of N. Y. and Arthur E. Burke, First Mortgage Trustees.

J. Turner Butler, Jacksonville, Fla., and J. T. G. Crawford, Crawford & May, Jacksonville, Fla., and C. H. Holcomb, Miami, Fla., and Willard P. Scott, Oliver & Donnally, New York City, for S. A. Lynch interests.

Appleton, Rice & Perrin, New York City, and Bedell & Bedell, Jacksonville, Fla., for The Bank of The Manhattan Co. and J. Bryson Aird, Trustees, 1st and Refunding 5% bonds.

Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, Fla., for F. K. Conn, and others.

Walton, Hubbard, Schroeder, Lantaff & Atkins, Miami, Fla., for W. G. Welbon, and others.

Edward W. Bourne, Alexander & Green, New York City, and Richard B. Gwathmey, Washington, D. C., and Charles Cook Howell, Gen. Counsel, Wilmington, N. C., and Howell & Howell, Jacksonville, Fla., for A. C. L. Rr. Co.

Walter H. Brown, Jr., New York City, and Fleming, Jones, Scott & Botts, Jacksonville, Fla., for S. A. L. Ry. Co.

Henry L. Walker, Gen. Sol., Southern Railway, Washington, D. C., for So. Ry. Co.


PER CURIAM.

This matter came on to be heard before this Court on the 21st day of June, 1954, all parties having been notified to appear and present their views as to what action this Court should now take in the light of the judgment and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, 347 U.S. 298, 74 S.Ct. 574, 576.

Counsel representing the holders of the 5% Refunding Bonds of the Railway Company asked the Court to now adhere...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases