YECK v. RIETZKE


33 N.J. Super. 371 (1954)

110 A.2d 321

ANTHONY J. YECK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WALTER RIETZKE, HELEN RIETZKE, HIS WIFE, AND BARBARA LUDI, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 21, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Emil J. Hoos argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Alexander Levchuk argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Levchuk and Pappa, attorneys).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

Perceptibly the remedy to be afforded in response to the present appeal is the substitution of a judgment which in essential respects will be expressive of the orally announced conclusions of the trial judge. The factual pedestal upon which the controversial issues of law and equity are balanced is beyond meritorious attack.

However, a brief precursory disclosure of the facts is appropriate. In 1948 the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases