1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 32 N.J.
  5. 32 N.J. Super. 365 (1954)
 

VANDER GROEF v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.

32 N.J. Super. 365 (1954)

108 A.2d 472

MICHAEL VANDER GROEF, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 15, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Chashin and Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. John J. Monigan, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.

The trial court granted defendant's motion for judgment of dismissal after plaintiff had completed the liability portion of the negligence action he had instituted against defendant. The court held that plaintiff had failed to prove negligence and proximate cause. This appeal ensued.

Defendant maintained a loading platform at the rear of its bakery premises on L Avenue, Newark. The platform was 44...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases