ROHM & HAAS COMPANY v. PERMUTIT COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 1551.

130 F.Supp. 260 (1954)

ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. The PERMUTIT COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

Rehearing Denied February 17, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur G. Connolly and Thomas Cooch, Connolly, Cooch & Bove, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Caleb S. Layton and Henry M. Canby, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., Clarence D. Kerr and W. P. Churchill, Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, for defendant.


RODNEY, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment growing out of an action for patent infringement. The motion is to be determined by a consideration of the complaint, several affidavits filed by both parties, defendant's interrogatories propounded to plaintiff, certain requests for admissions which have remained unanswered, several depositions and a certified copy of the Patent Office file wrapper and contents of the patent in suit No. 2,629,710.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases