STATE v. SERAPHINE


266 Wis. 118 (1954)

STATE, Respondent, vs. SERAPHINE and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 2, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by A. L. Tilton of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by the Attorney General and Stewart G. Honeck, deputy attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Honeck and Mr. Platz.


BROADFOOT, J.

Secs. 85.47 (1) (a) and (d), Stats., deal with overloads on Class "A" highways. It is the first contention of the defendants upon this appeal that the state failed to prove that the highway upon which the defendants were traveling at the time of the alleged violations was a Class "A" highway. The statutes provide that state trunk highways and connecting streets shall be designated as Class "A" highways. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases