1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 31 N.J.
  5. 31 N.J. Super. 350 (1954)
 

RUNK v. RICKENBACHER TRANSPORTATION CO.

31 N.J. Super. 350 (1954)

106 A.2d 554

INES R. RUNK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. RICKENBACHER TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 28, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. H. Hurlburt Tomlin argued the cause for the respondent-appellant (Messrs. Orlando, Devine & Tomlin, attorneys; Mr. Samuel P. Orlando, of counsel).

Mr. Lawrence N. Park argued the cause for the petitioner-respondent (Mr. Robert J. Tait Paul, attorney).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, FRANCIS and FREUND.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This appeal is from a judgment of the Camden County Court affirming an interlocutory judgment of the Workmen's Compensation Division determining the controversy to be within its jurisdiction.

The petition filed by Ines R. Runk, widow of Norman W. Runk, on behalf of herself and three infant children, alleges that her husband was employed by the appellant as a truck driver and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases