1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 266 Wis.
  5. 266 Wis. 100 (1954)
 

HEMANS v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

266 Wis. 100 (1954)

HEMANS, Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 2, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Leo W. Slensby, attorney, and Kivett & Kasdorf, A. W. Kivett, and David L. Halverson of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Slensby and Mr. Halverson.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the respondents William Pessin, Al Urkofsky, and Maryland Casualty Company there was a brief by Moore & Prentice of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Raymond J. Moore.

MARTIN, J.

The only question involved is whether there is credible evidence to sustain the findings of the commission. It is well established that if there is such evidence, the findings will not be disturbed on appeal. Indrebo v. Industrial Comm. (1932), 209 Wis. 272, 243 N. W. 464.

After thorough examination of the record we are of the opinion that it contains ample credible evidence to support the finding that plaintiff was not performing services...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases