1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 118 F.Supp.
  5. 118 F.Supp. 236 (1954)
 

O'ROURKE v. WATERFRONT COMMISSION

118 F.Supp. 236 (1954)

O'ROURKE et al. v. WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR et al.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

January 30, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry A. Lowenberg, New York City, for plaintiffs, Jacob W. Friedman, New York City, of counsel.

Lawrence E. Walsh, General Counsel to Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, New York City, for defendants, Whitman Knapp, David Simon, Arthur Brooks, New York City, of counsel.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This action is another attack upon the Constitutionality of the Waterfront Commission Act.1 The particular section of the law challenged by these plaintiffs is Article V of the Act, which requires that pier superintendents and hiring agents who respectively supervise and select the longshoremen for hire must be licensed by the Waterfront Commission. The article further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases