1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 44 Wn.2d
  5. 44 Wn.2d 308 (1954)
 

CUDMORE v. TJOMSLAND

No. 32589.

44 Wn.2d 308 (1954)

266 P.2d 1058

ALFRED T. CUDMORE, Respondent, v. ENOCH R. TJOMSLAND et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

February 25, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pemberton & Orloff, for appellant.

Leo C. Goodman, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents primarily questions of fact, and there is little dispute as to the applicable law.

Our examination of the record satisfies us that there is evidence to sustain the basic finding of the trial court that there was a warranty by the vendor that a bull and three heifers were free of disease, and that the warranty was breached because the animals were diseased when sold.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases