ZINKERMAN v. TAFT STORES


30 N.J. Super. 322 (1954)

104 A.2d 617

FRANK E. ZINKERMAN, TRADING AS FAIR BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TAFT STORES, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 22, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Simon J. Griffinger argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Louis J. Pantages argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

In undertaking the consideration of the present appeal it is imperative initially to realize that where a stenographic record of the evidence and of the essential characteristics of the trial has not been taken in the district court, our appellate survey of the case is necessarily confined to the statement of the proceedings settled by the trial judge pursuant to R.R. 1:6-3; R.R. 2:6. Bancroft...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases