PITTS v. WHITE


103 A.2d 245 (1954)

PITTS et al. v. WHITE.

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex.

March 8, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Howard Thompson, Georgetown, for plaintiffs.

Samuel R. Russell (of Tunnell & Tunnell), Georgetown, for defendant.


RICHARDS, President Judge.

The contention is made that the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant on May 8, 1953, is invalid, by reason of the fact that the jury by which said judgment was rendered was not drawn in the manner provided by the statute and that its proceedings were, therefore, null and void.

Rule 59(b), Del.C.Ann., provides that a motion for a new trial shall be served not later than ten days after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases