CHISOLM v. CAINES

Equity No. 57.

147 F.Supp. 188 (1954)

Alexander R. CHISOLM and George H. Penniman, citizens and residents of the State of New York, Joseph M. Fox and John Wister, citizens of the State of Pennsylvania, v. Edmund A. CAINES, commonly called Ball Caines, Archie Thomson and Alexander Thomson, W. B. Smith and George Mills, citizens and residents of the State of South Carolina.

United States District Court E. D. South Carolina.

March 20, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hagood, Rivers & Young, by G. L. B. Rivers, Charleston, S. C., for petitioners.

Smith & Moore, by J. B. Moore, Georgetown, S. C., Rosen & Rosen, by Sylvan L. Rosen and C. C. Grimes, Jr., Georgetown, S. C., for respondents.


WILLIAMS, District Judge.

On December 3, 1953 I issued an order requiring Abe I. Fogle, L. C. Cooper, R. V. McDaniel, W. A. Gasque, Sr., and M. L. Hopkins to appear before me in Charleston, South Carolina, to show cause why they should not be permanently enjoined from trespassing on the property described as follows:

"All that piece, parcel and portion of the marsh land, being a part of said Friendfield Plantation, situate, lying and being in the County of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases