1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 268 Wis.
  5. 268 Wis. 56 (1954)
 

READING v. READING

268 Wis. 56 (1954)

READING, Respondent, vs. READING, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 9, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Kurt Schnellbaecher, attorney, and John J. Burke of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Burke.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by William H. Freytag of Elkhorn.

BROADFOOT, J.

The defendant contends that the judgment is erroneous. She first calls attention to sec. 270.57, Stats., which provides that the relief granted to the plaintiff, if there be no answer, cannot exceed that which is demanded in the complaint. Attention is also called to the case of Hoh v. Hoh, 84 Wis. 378, 54 N. W. 731, in which it was held that this section of the statutes is applicable to divorce cases. This case does not appear to have been overruled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases