1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 34 N.J.
  5. 34 N.J. Super. 278 (1954)
 

SHIDDELL v. ELECTRO RUST-PROOFING CORP.

34 N.J. Super. 278 (1954)

112 A.2d 290

EDWARD B. SHIDDELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ELECTRO RUST-PROOFING CORPORATION (N.J.), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 5, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward J. Gilhooly argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Gilhooly, Yauch & Fagan, attorneys).

Mr. Robert L. Hood argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. William J. Egan, attorney).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Appeal is taken from a summary judgment of the Law Division granted on a motion pursuant to R.R. 4:58-2, and R.R. 4:58-3.

Plaintiff's complaint is in three counts. By the first count he claims defendant and its predecessors in interest granted him for a valuable consideration a franchise consisting of an exclusive right, vested in plaintiff for the term of his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases