MOORE v. CROSSWELL

No. 751.

82 S.E.2d 208 (1954)

240 N.C. 473

MOORE v. CROSSWELL.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 4, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Horton Poe, Jr., James R. Patton, Durham, for plaintiff, appellant.

Reade, Fuller, Newsom & Graham, Durham, for defendant, appellee.


JOHNSON, Justice.

This appeal is predicated upon assignments of error, both of omission and commission, in the charge. Yet, the assignments urged are not supported by exceptions previously noted as required by our rules. See Rules 19(3) and 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 554 and 558. While exceptions to the charge may be noted after trial, when the statement of case on appeal is prepared, even so, such exceptions should be included in appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases