1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 266 Wis.
  5. 266 Wis. 7 (1954)
 

GALEWSKI v. NOE

266 Wis. 7 (1954)

GALEWSKI, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. NOE and wife, Defendants and Appellants: VILLAGE OF FOX POINT, Intervening Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 2, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Joseph A. Barly of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Shea & Hoyt of Milwaukee, and for the intervening respondent by Maxwell H. Herriott, attorney, and Maxwell H. Herriott and Laurence E. Gooding, Jr., of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Herriott.

BROADFOOT, J.

The appellants first contend that the reservations in the various deeds by the Calumet Land Company did not constitute a complete dedication of the land so reserved for a public highway. They contend that in Wisconsin five elements are necessary for a complete dedication: "(1) An absolute dedication; (2) a setting apart; (3) surrender to the public use of the land by the proprietors; (4) an acceptance; (5) a formal opening by the proper authorities or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases