1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 99 Ohio
  5. 99 Ohio App. 152 (1954)
 

CLARK v. CITY OF CINCINNATI

No. 7960.

99 Ohio App. 152 (1954)

CLARK, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided October 11, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James R. Clark and Mr. Burton E. Robinson, for appellee.

Mr. Henry M. Bruestle, city solicitor, Mr. James W. Farrell, Jr., and Mr. Edgar W. Holtz, for appellants.

MATTHEWS, P. J.

The plaintiff is an attorney at law, practicing his profession in the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, and filed this action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, whom he alleged were so numerous that it was impracticable to bring them all before the court. The defendants are the city of Cincinnati and its commissioner, whose duties were to administer and enforce the provisions of an ordinance purporting to impose an earned income tax. This...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases