1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 120 F.Supp.
  5. 120 F.Supp. 128 (1954)
 

LEE OPTICAL OF OKLAHOMA v. WILLIAMSON

Civ. No. 6002.

120 F.Supp. 128 (1954)

LEE OPTICAL OF OKLAHOMA, Inc. et al. v. WILLIAMSON, Atty.Gen. of Oklahoma et al.

United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma.

March 1, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dick H. Woods and John Phillips (of Stinson, Mag, Thomson, McEvers & Fizzell), Kansas City, Mo., and Duke Duvall (of Dudley, Duvall & Dudley), Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs.

Fred Hansen and James C. Harkin, Asst. Attys. Gen., State of Oklahoma, Fred Daugherty, LeRoy Powers, Oklahoma City, Okl., and Paul Harkey, Idabel, Okl., for defendants.

Before MURRAH, Circuit Judge, VAUGHT, Chief Judge, and WALLACE, District Judge.

WALLACE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs bring this action under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act1 and challenge the constitutionality of certain provisions found in the recent Oklahoma Enactment dealing with the regulation of "visual care".2 The statute subject to attack is commonly referred to as Enrolled House Bill No. 953 and is entitled:

"An Act relating to visual care: defining terms; prohibiting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases