1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 29 N.J.
  5. 29 N.J. Super. 209 (1954)
 

ARENOFSKY v. ARENOFSKY

29 N.J. Super. 209 (1954)

102 A.2d 101

SHIRLEY ARENOFSKY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BARNEY ARENOFSKY, EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF DAVID ARENOFSKY, DECEASED, HAROLD ARENOFSKY, BARNEY ARENOFSKY, LOUIS ARENOFSKY AND HYMAN ARENOFSKY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 7, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sydney Isadore Turtz argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Cohen & Turtz, attorneys).

Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Joseph Moritz, attorney).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

The Chancery Division, in construing decedent's will, found that a certain specific bequest had been adeemed. The legatees and the executor appeal.

On November 29, 1950 the testator, David Arenofsky, executed his last will and testament. At this time he was a member of a partnership doing business under the trade name Max Arenofsky Sons. The firm had been inherited in equal

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases