HOLLISTER v. FIEDLER


30 N.J. Super. 203 (1954)

104 A.2d 61

ROBINSON G. HOLLISTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THEODORE FIEDLER, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM C. FIEDLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 18, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Bigel argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Bruck & Bigel, attorneys).

Mr. Harold D. Feuerstein argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Lester Sandles, attorney).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

A panoramic exposure of the factual background of this litigation is contained in a previous decision of the Appellate Division reported in 22 N.J.Super. 439 (App. Div. 1952). To reproduce or redesign it here is inexpedient.

It is, however, informational to relate that in conformity with the mandate of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases