HULL v. BRANDYWINE FIBRE PRODUCTS CO.

Civ. A. 1514.

121 F.Supp. 108 (1954)

HULL v. BRANDYWINE FIBRE PRODUCTS CO.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

March 25, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert L. Simon, Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr., Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

William H. Foulk, William Duffy, Jr., Wilmington, Del., for defendant.


RODNEY, District Judge.

This is a motion for a summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. 28 U.S.C.

At a former stage of the case, viz., on December 1, 1953, an opinion was filed as to the status then considered. Reargument as to certain matters has been had, and the former opinion is annulled and this opinion substituted therefor.

The original complaint filed December 30, 1952 was quite abbreviated in form. It alleged diversity of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases