PUTMAN v. CAMERON

Docket No. 20019.

129 Cal.App.2d 89 (1954)

276 P.2d 102

ELEANOR TYNAN PUTMAN, Respondent, v. ARTHUR A. CAMERON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

November 22, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Overton, Lyman, Prince & Vermille for Appellant.

Loeb & Loeb, Allen E. Susman and Herman F. Selvin for Respondent.


MOORE, P.J.

The primary question for decision is whether an agreement was made prior to the commencement of this action, settling the controversy of the parties.

April 15, 1947, respondent leased to appellant her valuable home at Pacific Palisades for one year. At the expiration of the term, they agreed upon a continuance of the lease on a month-to-month basis. The lease was terminated and possession was restored to respondent in February 1950. At different...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases