VOGT v. BOROUGH OF BELMAR


14 N.J. 195 (1954)

101 A.2d 849

FRANCIS A. VOGT, JR., BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, FRANCIS A. VOGT, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF BELMAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 11, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas F. Shebell argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stephen D. Maguire, attorney).

Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

On May 22, 1950, appellant suffered personal injury under circumstances that concededly would entitle him to compensation under the State Workmen's Compensation Act of 1911, as amended, R.S. 34:15-7 et seq., if at the time of the mishap he bore to the defendant Borough of Belmar the relationship contemplated by section 43 of the act, as amended by c....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases