1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 161 Ohio
  5. 161 Ohio St. 43 (1954)
 

STATE, EX REL. HANRAHAN v. ZUPNIK

Nos. 33553, 33554, 33555 and 33556.

161 Ohio St. 43 (1954)

THE STATE, EX REL. HANRAHAN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ZUPNIK ET AL., BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ET AL., APPELLANTS, ET AL. THE STATE, EX REL. HORN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BATH ET AL., BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ET AL., APPELLANTS, ET AL. THE STATE, EX REL. BARRETT ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ZUPNIK ET AL., BOARD OF TRUSTEE, ET AL., APPELLANTS, ET AL. THE STATE, EX REL. ANKLAM ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BATH ET AL., BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ET AL., APPELLANTS, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 17, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Wilmot, Baskin, Lausche & Kelley and Mr. A. F. Gallagher, for appellees.

Mr. Joseph H. Crowley, director of law, Mr. James M. McSweeney and Mr. Richard O. Horn, for appellants.

MIDDLETON, J.

The only error assigned in this court is that the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas allowing the writs of mandamus.

Three principal questions are debated. They are the significance of the statutes which became effective May 26, 1937, commonly referred to as the vested right statutes; the effect of the comprehensive revision of the pension laws effected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases