1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 123 Cal.App.2d
  5. 123 Cal.App.2d 81 (1954)
 

DICKOW v. COOKINHAM

Docket No. 15372.

123 Cal.App.2d 81 (1954)

266 P.2d 63

CARRIE E. DICKOW et al., Appellants, v. FRANKLIN COOKINHAM et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 5, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest I. Spiegl and Elliot M. Epsteen for Appellants.

Robert L. Lamb, Harry Gottesfeld and Cooley, Crowley & Gaither for Respondents.

BRAY, J.

In a malpractice action plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of defendants.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Sufficiency of the evidence.

2. Is this court limited to the ground given by the trial court for its action?

3. Should evidence have been admitted to show that release of one tort feasor was not intended to release other tort feasors?

RECORD

Plaintiffs' complaint charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases