1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 125 F.Supp.
  5. 125 F.Supp. 74 (1954)
 

HOLLAND FURNACE COMPANY v. PURCELL

No. 2495.

125 F.Supp. 74 (1954)

HOLLAND FURNACE COMPANY, Holland, Michigan, Plaintiff, v. James A. PURCELL, Hearing Examiner, Federal Trade Commission, Washington 25, D. C., Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Michigan, S. D.

September 23, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deeb, Dunn, Hoffius & Elferdink and Joseph F. Deeb and Earl Waring Dunn, Grand Rapids, Mich., Trenkamp & Coakley and Robert H. Trenkamp, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Wendell A. Miles, U. S. Atty., W. D. Mich., Grand Rapids, Mich., and James E. Corkey, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

STARR, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principal office and place of business in Holland, Michigan, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of warm-air furnaces and heating equipment. On May 4, 1954, the Federal Trade Commission issued its complaint against said Holland Furnace Company, the Commission's docket No. 6203, alleging that the company had violated certain provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and that a proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases