1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 33 N.J.
  5. 33 N.J. Super. 156 (1954)
 

MUELLER v. EUCENHAM

33 N.J. Super. 156 (1954)

109 A.2d 462

HAROLD G. MUELLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DANIEL EUCENHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND DANIEL EVERNHAM, JR., AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, DANIEL EVERNHAM, AND DORIS EVERNHAM, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM DANIEL EVERNHAM, INTERVENING-COUNTERCLAIMANTS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 12, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys; Mr. Abraham I. Harkavy and Mr. Lieb, of counsel).

Mr. Clarkson S. Fisher argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Frankel & Frankel, attorneys; Mr. George A. Bariscillo, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Monmouth County District Court (1) permitting defendant (wrongly designated in the original complaint as Eucenham) to counterclaim, and (2) permitting defendant's infant children, Daniel Evernham, Jr. and Doris Evernham, by their father as guardian ad litem, to intervene and file their claims against plaintiff.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases