1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 30 N.J.
  5. 30 N.J. Super. 153 (1954)
 

FEIST v. JOSEPH DIXON CRUCIBLE CO.

30 N.J. Super. 153 (1954)

103 A.2d 893

MAY M. FEIST, PLAINTIFF, AND AMBROOK INDUSTRIES, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH DIXON CRUCIBLE COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 20, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James P. Beggans argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Richard H. Hughes, on the brief; Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas V. Jardine argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Robert Carey, Jr., of counsel; Messrs. Carey, Schenk & Jardine, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

This appeal concerns itself with the refusal of the appellant Joseph Dixon Crucible Company (hereinafter referred to as "Dixon") to permit the respondent-stockholders of Dixon to inspect its stock transfer books.

The complaint of May M. Feist, filed in the Chancery Division of this court, together with all pending motions and other matters, were later transferred to the Law Division. In the Law Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases