MANGO v. BRODSKO


32 N.J. Super. 143 (1954)

107 A.2d 824

VINCENT MANGO, FRANCES MANGO, FRANK MANGO, DOMENICA MANGO, WILLIAM CORSINO, JENNY CORSINO, ANTHONY CORTESE AND CONCETTIA CORTESE, PLAINTIFFS, v. ALBERT BRODSKO, SOL FARBSTEIN AND NEW DEAL LUMBER AND MILL WORK COMPANY, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided September 16, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph R. Moss, attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. James Hunter III (Messrs. Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read, attorneys), for defendants.


HANEMAN, J.S.C.

This matter concerns itself with cross-motions for summary judgment after the pleadings had been closed.

Plaintiffs herein seek to enjoin the defendants from continuing with the construction of a lumber yard upon the ground that the same would violate a covenant resulting from a neighborhood scheme established by the original owner of the entire tract of land upon which the realty of the plaintiffs and defendants is situated.

The defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases