1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 30 N.J.
  5. 30 N.J. Super. 136 (1954)
 

ROSENTHAL v. STATE EMPLOYEES', SYSTEM OF N.J.

30 N.J. Super. 136 (1954)

103 A.2d 896

PEARL ROSENTHAL, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 16, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel Weitzman argued the cause for the claimant-appellant (Messrs. Parsonnet, Weitzman & Oransky, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph A. Murphy, Assistant Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. Daniel De Brier, Deputy Attorney-General, on the brief; Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General, attorney).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

This appeal concerns itself with the determination of the defendant-respondent, State Employees' Retirement System of New Jersey (hereinafter referred to as the "System"), that claimant-appellant, Pearl Rosenthal, widow of Louis Rosenthal, a member of the System, is not entitled to payment pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 43:14-37, reading as follows:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases