1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 15 N.J.
  5. 15 N.J. 139 (1954)
 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA v. PONG-TSU MOW

15 N.J. 139 (1954)

104 A.2d 322

REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND KUO-HWA YU, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PONG-TSU MOW (ALSO KNOWN AS PANG-TSU MOW), DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 5, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David Stoffer argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Stoffer and Jacobs, attorneys).

Mr. Emory C. Risley argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court, Law Division, denying defendant-appellant's motion to quash a writ of attachment and the levy made thereunder, and to set aside two orders directing the issuance of the writ and substituted process, R.R. 4:77-2(a) (b). The appeal is apparently taken under R.R. 2:2-3(a)(3) on the theory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases