1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 126 Cal.App.2d
  5. 126 Cal.App.2d 13 (1954)
 

PROVIDENT IRRIGATION DIST. v. CECIL

Docket No. 8379.

126 Cal.App.2d 13 (1954)

271 P.2d 157

PROVIDENT IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al., Respondents, v. SAMUEL CECIL et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

June 15, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duard F. Geis and Virgil O'Sullivan for Appellants.

Minasian & Minasian and P.J. Minasian for Respondents.

VAN DYKE, P.J.

In this action two owners of land within an irrigation district joined with the district in an action brought to obtain mandatory and prohibitory injunctions against defendants, who also owned land within the district.

Responsive to the pleadings, the trial court found the following: Provident Irrigation District is and at all times mentioned in the complaint was an irrigation district organized by virtue of law. The north boundary of defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases