FLOOD, J., May 19, 1954.
This case must go back to the zoning board for only one reason. The zoning board based its decision primarily, if not solely, upon the fact that the area of the rear yard and of the open court were too small, but at the hearing the applicant's counsel was told that the rear-yard area would not be the determining factor and thus was dissuaded from establishing the cost of taking off the rear of the property to give the additional rear-yard...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
